totient: (Default)
I 100% disagree with the "good people on both sides" narrative. But probably not in the way that you're thinking. The fundamental problem with it is with the concept of "good people".

The problem is that both sides have -- no, consist mostly of -- people who *think* they are being good. Maybe because of propaganda, or complacency, or ignorance, but mostly by actively convincing themselves of it, as people have probably done since the invention of the concept of "good". Just like any cult, deprogramming people who think they're being good when they're not is a lot harder than just telling them they're not, or even why they're not.

There are a few people who know they're on the wrong side but are trapped there. Visibly confronting the issue might help a few of those escape, or help people who aren't trapped take more care not to get trapped. Maybe we're in a place where that is all we can do. But I am more hopeful than that, and less interested in the easy but partial solution.

Which means that we have our work cut out for us.
totient: (Default)
Nine or ten years ago, I had a conversation with Mikki Kendall about what was keeping people of color away from Arisia. There was a lot of speculation, and some important thoughts about tracking our progress, but only one concrete suggestion: that our badges were too small.

That sounds kind of absurd on the face of it. On one level the explanation is simple: Black teens -- and by this I mean specific Black teens -- felt unsafe in a hotel whose security staff didn't think they belonged at the convention. Bigger badges would more clearly identify them as part of the community and cut down on the harassment they got for being there. But of course this barrier is just one of thousands. The point isn't to fix it (though that's also important). The point is to turn Arisia into the kind of organization that notices subtle things like this and fixes them, or better yet is capable of predicting micro-impacts before they happen and can, to switch metaphors, build a playing field that's actually level instead of being full of potholes.

I had the idea that having Jodie as conchair would help with this. We certainly got a lesson in cultural assumptions from having him on board, but of course Jodie was a person and not some kind of magic talisman so there are still plenty of things that need fixing, and also we'll need to come to understand the way in which the changes he made addressed this problem because, well, they're often subtle.

One of those is just becoming clear to me, and I thought I'd share it because I know I would never have thought of it myself. When writing the most recent budget, Jodie aimed high on all of the small admin line items. This put a couple of thousand dollars of expenses in the budget that weren't likely to be used, but our income numbers were uncertain enough that this seemed like a reasonable idea, and it's not like we had the volunteers available to pull off some of the things that fell out of the budget because of it. I didn't really think more of it until the con was over and it was time to close the books.

At which point I realized that we had a whole raft of cultural assumptions about budgeting. The biggest is that Arisia's event isn't a fundraiser with the goal of raising as much money for our charitable purpose as possible. The event *is* our charitable purpose and there are places where we're limited in our purpose by the amount of money available. We have some policies that let us reallocate money between line items as needed, so that money that we don't manage to use for our charitable purpose in one place can be used for it in another. We're bad at communicating which those places are, or encouraging people to ask for more money if they can use it effectively. Most people think we're in a more normal budget regime where spending less money is the goal and going over your budget is bad.

In other words, we have set up an asshole filter.

And maybe we even kind of knew that we'd done that, and figured that we could sort of make up for it by encouraging people to be, as [personal profile] siderea mostly calls it in that post, transgressive. But something I certainly didn't connect, and don't see in [personal profile] siderea's post, is that POC have a lot less freedom to be transgressive in American society. The good news is that this year we had enough POC volunteers to be able to observe the effect. The bad news, of course, is that it's absolutely there. Not every line was budgeted so high that it wound up actually being extra, and it was POC who wound up not asking for reimbursement for things they decided to spend anyway (since the charitable purpose was quite visible).

So going forward, we'll find ways to build a budget that make it clear where people should spend additional money if they have the opportunity to do so, without having to budget as if everyone will in fact do that.

And along with finally having larger badges, that will be two steps forward, out of thousands. Not for lack of willingness, but for lack of understanding.

I'm always looking for more understanding. But I think the only way I'm really going to get these tools to disassemble injustice is to hand them to someone else.
totient: (justice)
At the intersection of some of my interests, here's part of a thread from Facebook in response to some epistemological analysis of the phrase "consent violations are bad".

OK, where even to begin.

First: by most lay concepts of "good" and "bad" rarely is anything 100% good or 100% bad, nor are a lot of things really knowable in the moment even as better or worse. As ethical judgments the concepts are close to useless. But making ethical judgments of everything in the world is exhausting even where it works, so most people have rules of thumb that on balance result in behaviors the ethics of which they're more comfortable with than if they had not used those rules of thumb. I'm going to use the phrase "moral systems" for those to distinguish them from their underlying ethics.

As part of a moral system the words "good" and "bad" are useful stand-ins for the compass points of moral preference. But these are not states that are ever achieved and in most moral systems they're not even states that you'd want to achieve. I can argue for, say, more resources for the arts, and never have to think about how eventually that's going to be so many resources that there are not enough for feeding people any more, because my compass point is not a place, just a direction, and also it is not the underlying ethic, just a generality. That the direction in question is part of my moral system has as much to do with where we're starting from as it does with what I want to work towards.

There's a separate problem that "good" and "bad" are so often conflated with "pleasant" and "unpleasant". Even a utilitarian philosophy [editor's note: you're reading one] benefits by separating those concepts.

All of this leads me to consider arguments that something is "good" or "bad" as intrinsically arguments in favor of or against particular moral systems, and not actually ethical determinations. This allows for the generalities that are almost always part of such systems, such as "consent violations are bad", while implicitly acknowledging that the generality is imperfect. But even in a conversation between people who hold the same underlying ethical values, moral systems are likely to be in dispute. That is, a sentence with the word "good" or "bad" in it is usually an argument.

If one uses harm as an ethical metric, I think this points to "consent violations are bad because avoiding them results in less harm, and the question of how that happens and whether nonconsent is intrinsically harmful or merely tends towards being harmful is unanswerable and irrelevant".

However it *is* necessary in that frame to answer the question of what constitutes a consent violation, which is a very fuzzy question and in most moral systems is going to be deeply bound up with whether the action in question is likely to be harmful. This binding is how it is that things like putting toddlers into carseats are not generally considered relevant to the moral question.
totient: (Default)
Tea, Coffee, or Soda?
I've been reading The Expanse and one of the things I love is how each character's preferred caffeination method is gone into in great depth. It lends some dimensionality to the characters. Plus you know by the end of Avasarala's introductory tea preparation that this is someone who Does Not Fuck Around and indeed, that's really her defining characteristic.

There do not seem to be any soda drinkers. Carbonated water is a by-product of carbon capture from fossil fuel burning power plants, so perhaps it's just not a thing in a fusion powered world.

I am in the middle of book eight and I keep expecting the next schism in the world to be between the coffee drinkers and the tea drinkers. It hasn't happened yet, but every other change in the world seems like it has, so who knows.
Dogs or Cats?
Lately I have observed that 90% of everyone is really just going along with the prevailing winds. The remaining 5% on either side of that will be good when everyone else is evil, or evil when everyone else is good. It's how you get a few good cops in the worst police departments, but also how those departments are so terrible. It's also how some cities can have so many dogs and others so many cats.

Which are the dogs and which are the cats is a matter of opinion.
Can you play an instrument?
This is one of those time traveler meme answers. The problem with going back in time to tell yourself something is it has to be something your younger self would believe. But my younger self, who wanted to play a rock instrument, would totally have listened if someone who looked like my dad came back to tell him that if he picked guitar, his mom would have let him play rock music because she wasn't (then, anyway) fond of classical guitar.
What’s your sun sign?
One of the more fascinating books I own is an extensive treatise on the history of Daylight Savings Time in North America. It's pretty convoluted, as there were decades-long hodgepodges of local approaches between when the idea was dreamed up and when it was standardized. There's an entire chapter just on Indiana.

This book is still in print, because it's used by astrologers to convert times of day on birth certificates from local time to GMT. That's most of the value I've ever gotten from astrology. Not that I have a problem with randomly generated divination as a tool to see what's on someone's mind, like flipping a coin to see if you like the result. But I find that tarot has more material and more options for interpretation, and is more amenable to reinterpretation on the fly.
First song lyrics that pop into your head?
Right now I'm assembling a dance playlist. The rule is it has to be a tune that makes you get up and dance, and every credited artist has to be female. Acts with group names can't have male band members at the time the track was recorded (so for instance, La Roux is only OK after 2012). Individual recording artists are generally fine if that person is female. There can be male dancers or backup singers or session musicians or producers or what have you.

I am taking a fairly broad view of "female" but it does not appear that Harris Milstead used she/her pronouns (nor that he considered that to be a deadname), so I am not putting Divine on this list.

A slightly sticky point is Stock Aitken Waterman productions. I am allowing any of them, but I see why they might be disallowed, or only allowed for tracks like the ones on Donna Summer's Another Place and Time album where the artist was previously famous.

As a result of working on this playlist I've spent a lot of time recently with songs stuck in my head.
Do you have any tattoos?
The person I got this meme from compared tattoos to babies and advanced degrees, all of which she finds fascinating though she has none of her own.

I was once asked in a job interview if I was sure I didn't have a PhD. I'm pretty sure I would have noticed. I can't be quite as certain that there aren't any children I don't know about.
Do you have any hobbies?
Apparently, filling out memes without actually answering them.
totient: (Default)
A bunch of folks who think they know what art is are debating whether AI art is art over in the convention-running social medias.

So far every criticism I've heard is also true of someone whose works sell for millions of dollars. Kruger, Rauschenberg, Banksy, edited to add: Koons. (Did you know that a Rauschenberg recently sold for $89 million? I didn't until today, but I'm pleased that the reaction of the art world seems to have been "it's about time".)

Ultimately I think the question is meaningless. Is any given image art? If so, at what point did it become art, and how? To my mind, the first question is much more about what happens after it's finished than what happens beforehand. Trying to classify things as art according to their creation is absurd.

Patience

Jul. 30th, 2022 10:14 am
totient: (Default)
Oren Jay Sofer's newsletter this morning has a bit about patience. It's not on his web site, but he opens with this question:
How can having patience with climate emergency, war, and the rest of the chaos in the world be useful?

And then proceeds to talk about how to have patience with overwhelming things without becoming either passive or overwhelmed.

That's great and all, but he never really answers his question. I think that's because he's asking very slightly the wrong question. (And not just because of which things he chooses to lump in with "the rest of the chaos in the world".) Better, I think is:
How can having patience for climate emergency, war, and the rest of the chaos in the world be useful?

Let me give an example.

Arisia recently opened new bank accounts at a Black-owned bank here in Boston. Yesterday it was time to update the signature cards for these. My previous experience with this is that it is always a hassle, that the rules for how to make it happen are never presented the same way twice, and in general there's way more runaround than there has to be. But at our old bank, it has also been that walking in to a branch as an older white man, with a lot of class markers, cut the hassle down significantly. (Including that the locations and hours of the branches were arranged to make even walking in less of a hassle for people like me.)

This was not our experience yesterday. It took nearly four hours to get the signature cards changed, including a lot of driving back and forth across Boston for different pieces of paper.

And that is the point: we opened these bank accounts as a way of giving up our privilege. It takes patience not to be the one who gets to take shortcuts with red tape. But it's also useful in a way that Oren misses.

Dealing with big problems is going to take a long time. It may be a while before we have anything visible to show for it. We are going to need a lot of patience, both in the moment and in the long term, in order to keep up the effort we need.
totient: (Default)
Scattered across the American southwest are trading posts. Not the Hudson's Bay company fur trading posts that mostly closed in the 1840s; these are trading posts founded to trade with the Navajo and other tribes in the 70 years after the Long Walk. At their peak, just before World War II, there were nearly 150 of them, of which dozens remain in operation -- I don't know exactly how many as there is no comprehensive list, nor a category in Wikipedia. I've been to several: Hubbell, Cameron, Gouldings, Ismay, Twin Rocks, McGee. They're all different, sometimes drastically so: Cameron's Trading Post is absolutely enormous with tour buses pulling in to it every few minutes, whereas there wasn't much sign that anyone other than myself went into Ismay's Trading Post at all on the day I was there, towards the very end of its 90+ year existence. Hubbell is now a museum; McGee is mostly an art gallery. Each has taken its own path.

But for all their differences, they have some things in common, so much so that when researching this post, I read yelp reviews stating "that's not a trading post" and nodded, because the establishment in question didn't fit the pattern. I'm not sure I can exactly put my finger on what the rule really is. In my experience generally they're right on a political boundary, right next to at least one stunning landmark, and buy things as well as selling them. But I don't think this is what those yelp reviewers were talking about and there are exceptions to these and any other rule you might come up with.

So it is, I think, with the sorts of science fiction conventions I like to work on. DragonCon and WesterCon are as different as Cameron and Ismay. But there is a kernel of sameness within them anyway. And there's no need to define that essence, nor any one rule that exactly describes what that kernel is.
totient: (Default)
In the past month my Buddhist community has been working with the difference between acceptance and acquiscence, the former (as the opposite of denial) being an important step towards action and not the passivation that Buddhism's inward focus brings to its reputation. Equanimity is important, but so is anger.

Yesterday I sat a retreat with Rod Owens on the Four Noble Truths of Buddhism. That wasn't the reframing one might imagine from Rod, but the reframing came easily to mind, so here it is:

  1. There is injustice in the world, in good times and in bad, endlessly and in endless variety.
  2. Injustice is caused by people. All people, individually and collectively, intentionally and unintentionally.
  3. Injustice is a call to action, always. The opportunity to act may change but the obligation does not.
  4. The fight against injustice is not a ticky box. It must imbue every aspect of your life. No single action absolves you of responsibility.
totient: (space)
Gleaned from my gracious pre- and post-con hosts:

The key to the universe is not a house key, it's an ignition key.
totient: (Default)
Since there seem to be so many Kierkegaard quotes on my friends list tonight, I give you this:

"Far from idleness being the root of all evil, it is rather the only true good."

juggling

Aug. 5th, 2003 07:32 pm
totient: (Default)
The object of juggling isn't to throw as many balls as possible into the air. Nor is it even to toss balls back into the air as they come raining out of the sky. A pleasing effect comes from picking a few well-matched balls to re-loft, but it's even better to pass balls you care about back and forth with other folks juggling around you.
totient: (Default)
For some time I have maintained that when I am 80 years old I will do nothing but cackle. And inspired by Jenny Joseph I have begun to practice taking delight in things. But the other day in a pizzeria in Watertown I realized that there is something I will take delight in when I am 80 years old, which I cannot practice now, and that is calling cops "Sonny".
totient: (Default)
"rich or poor, it's nice to have money".

I heard this as a cute expression last night, but events elsewhere have reminded me of a twist: that assets and disposable income aren't the same, that the definitions of "rich", "poor", and "money" fluctuate between these two concepts, that some problems really can be fixed by throwing money at them, and that sometimes these problems are big enough that fixing them merits converting assets into disposable income.
totient: (Default)
Recently, I posted about how you can find anything on the internet. I think the glee I find from that is not so much that the 'net has enabled the collection of specialized knowledge (though it has), as that it reveals the inner wackiness of humanity through the dissemination of that knowledge. Specialization is what makes this species great. That's not just because it means that some member of the species will do or know anything you can dream of, but that our collective knowledge and ability bears the personal mark of whoever has chosen to specialize in that particular area.

Case in point: I am building a device which will have a number of connections to other electronic bits, some of them permanent and some not. I'm trying to cut down on the number of connectors in this device as connectors are a source of unreliability, so the thing I'm building will have some cords dangling off it. I want these to be springy cords, so that they get in the way less. But I also need 6 conductors in one of them, which is hard to find. The only retail source I've seen prices them at $90 -- absurd, when you can get a ham radio microphone containing the cord in question for $40. So I hunted around and quickly found that most of these cords are made by a company called Philatron. The plastic coating is called Philathane. In case you hadn't figured it out, the company is run by a guy named Phil, who's been doing this for about 30 years.

That's why I love mankind.

(Update: actually there's a second source which meets my requirements. The company in question has been around for 50 years; the founder has presumably kicked off as their web site has the lack of funkiness and personal touch that comes from being run by committee.)

quiz

Oct. 9th, 2002 06:39 pm
totient: (Default)
From an otherwise entirely unnoteworthy quiz:
Punk
...
You like to aggressively attack pop culture... Which somehow makes it love and mimic you.
totient: (Default)
Today is the 31st anniversary of the Attica prison rebellion. Tomorrow night, or rather early Sunday morning, is the 32nd anniversary of Jackson State (never heard of it? a similar thing happened 11 days earlier at Kent State, only Jackson State didn't get any press because it's a black college).

The point? Well, apart from the conclusion that I'm glad this isn't the 1970s, the point is that every day is an anniversary of something horrible, and ultimately we need to get past that in order to live.

Profile

totient: (Default)
phi

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 11:27 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios