totient: (seti)
Some folks at the Parkes radio telescope in Australia have found an interesting radio signal. Some key data isn't public yet, but with my former-SETI-researcher hat on there is one bit of information I find quite intriguing, and some other information that I suspect the mainstream media might latch onto that's really not.

The signal is a narrow band radio signal, which is somewhat interesting because when humans send out intentional interstellar radio signals we use narrow band signals ourselves. But it's really interesting because that makes it easier to tell if the signal is coming from the Earth.

An extraterrestrial signal on a fixed narrow band will appear to change frequency over time because of the Doppler shift *of the earth itself*. You may have seen the science museum demonstrations of Doppler shift using moving sound sources, or noticed changes in tone from vehicles as they pass by. But if the sound source is staying still and you are the one moving, you'll also hear similar shifts. Likewise the earth's rotation creates a shift or "chirp" in the signal as the telescope passes under it. A source that's coming from the earth will not exhibit a "chirp" because source and receiver are moving in tandem. SETI searches all look for this as the primary discriminator for earthbound sources, and it is very easy to detect.

This signal displays a "chirp" and that makes it very interesting. The exact nature of the chirp hasn't been released but I gather that there is a component from the Earth's motion plus another component that's attributable to the motion of the source. That might be useful for attributing the signal to a source whose motion matches, whether that is an astronomical object or merely some manmade space probe or satellite—or even an airplane—in our own solar system.

You may have heard that the signal is coming from the direction of Proxima Centauri b, a nearby Earth-sized planet in its star's habitable zone. This is not interesting at all. Planets like that are a dime a dozen, and there are probably countless others in that same direction.

You may also have heard that the frequency of this signal—980 MHz—is in a reserved band that is not used for radio communication by humans. That is true, but it doesn't mean those frequencies are empty. They're used for radar, and more prosaically by microwave ovens. Just because we're not communicating at these frequencies doesn't mean there isn't a lot of man-made noise there.

Seth Shostak has a great SETI researcher's view on this discovery which I think is spot on, unsurprisingly as he's one of the best, most level-headed folks working in the field today. He gets into the chirp in detail. And he doesn't even mention 980 MHz or Proxima Centauri b.

arecibo

Nov. 20th, 2020 12:17 pm
totient: (Default)
Folks are posting pics of themselves at Arecibo. I have some of those, but I also have this:


That's a circuit board I laid out. You can see my signature at the bottom right of the board, next to the 10-pin IDC connector. 30 copies of it were used in the Arecibo Search for Early Hydrogen for a few years in the late 90s. I didn't stay in radio astronomy long after that, but I'm still saddened by the news yesterday that they're going to have to take it down.
totient: (Default)
Today was the longest day of the year here in the Northern Hemisphere. But it wasn't the earliest sunrise, or the latest sunset.

What?

The length of a day -- 24 hours from sunrise to sunrise, on average -- comes mostly from Earth's rotation. But a few minutes of it comes from Earth's orbiting around the sun. It takes Earth 23 hours, 56 minutes, and a bit over 4 seconds to rotate 360 degrees, at the end of which time the stars will be in the same positions in the sky as they were the previous day. But because the sun isn't in the same place in the sky as it was the previous day, Earth has to rotate about 3 minutes and 56 seconds more to bring the sun back into the same apparent position it had been in 24 hours previously.

The catch is that "about". Two things affect this number. First, Earth's orbit isn't perfectly circular. It's closest to the sun in early January and furthest in early July. When it's further, it moves more slowly in its orbit, so it doesn't have to turn as much extra to make a day. When it's closer, it moves more quickly, so it has more to make up. Second, and right now more importantly, at the equinoxes some of the sun's apparent motion is north-south so Earth doesn't have to rotate as far to catch up to the sun's new east-west position. At the solstices, Earth has to turn quite a bit further to make up for same amount of orbital motion, because all of the sun's apparent motion is east-west. This makes the day/night cycle longer than average -- right now, it's about 24 hours 15 seconds from one sunset (or sunrise) to the next. The effect is even more pronounced in December when it's aligned with the eccentricity effect instead of opposed to it.

The longer days mean that here in Boston, though we've missed the earliest sunrise by about a week, we have until June 26 to celebrate the latest sunset of the year.
totient: (Default)
Last time the three things meme came up I concluded that my most interesting things are more "three unusual things I have done with people who don't happen to read my LJ" than three things I'd done on my own. But on reflection there are some things I think I can put down which won't be quite as much a function of which social circles read this blog. So...

Three things I've done that I'd be surprised if any of my friends (on LJ or otherwise) had:
  • Made an astronomical observation with an optical telescope of >5m aperture
  • Gone on a >1000km bike ride Edit: Finished last in a multi-day bike race
  • Competed in a motorsport by writing a computer program
totient: (Default)
Today I learned that Larry Niven can't spell.

Specifically, he can't spell "Klemperer".

serendipity

Sep. 2nd, 2004 11:28 am
totient: (Default)
CNN is reporting that SETI@home has found a strong candidate signal. BBC (quoting my former boss, Paul Horowitz) is reporting that they haven't. There's an interesting story here which neither of them are telling.

SETI@home is a serendipitous project. That is, the data they are analyzing have been collected as a side-effect of other operations that the Aricebo radio telescope was making; the project itself has no control over where the telescope will be pointed. These data are then sent across the net and analyzed as a side-effect of the other operations that the computers in question are (or in this case, aren't) making. The main scientific result to have come out of SETI@home is another serendipitous one: the discovery of natural variable radio sources, like Cepheid variables only on a different frequency. From time to time the data available from Aricebo are of a known radio variable, and some SETI@home participant will get a blip on her screen and post about it in her weblog. That CNN is picking up these stories shows something about the fuzzy line between fact and fancy on the net.

There's a long history of this approach in SETI research due to the difficulty of getting funding, and in fact one of the early projects was called Serendip. And a lot of scientific results have come serendipitously. I'd love to see a story on CNN or the BBC exploring the (real) scientific method using this subfield for an example.

durability

Jun. 13th, 2004 11:49 am
totient: (Default)
Inspired by [livejournal.com profile] hammercock, I just did a vanity search and found, among other things, a manual for the first program I ever wrote for money.

I don't know which is more incredible: that the software is still in use, 17 years later, or that it has been running on the same 8086 PC that entire time.
totient: (Default)
Sounds like a cross between a cynical classicism and an Anais Nin title, doesn't it?

This coming Tuesday morning (for those of you in EDT), Venus will transit the sun. The ingress and most of the transit itself will happen before sunrise here, but the egress will be visible. Contact III is at 7:05 AM and Contact IV is at 7:25, and the half-hour starting around 7 is the most interesting visible part of the transit. Starting shortly before Contact III, expect to see some amazing phenomena: first, the Black Drop effect, which is due to the fact that the human eye can't see the Sun's edge brightness gradation because it's past saturation, and later, a halo effect observed by Lomonosov in 1761 (the last-but-one such transit) which is due to refraction in Venus' dense atmosphere.

There's a fun map showing where the transit will be visible. Notice the grey areas in Nunavut and off the coast of Antarctica; those are where night and day (respectively) will occur entirely within the duration of the transit.
totient: (Default)
I have grown unaccustomed to seeing the full moon in the west.

Sure, I don't stay up as late now as I did in college, or even when I was living at the Ranch. I no longer rush to bed when the first birds start to chirp, to avoid the seratonin reaction to the dawn. But a waxing gibbous moon like tonight's sets well before sunup, and I live nearly 4 degrees east of my nominal time zone longitude, which makes moonset another 15 minutes earlier than that. It's not even two here, and still the moon hovers over the western horizon, a stranger I have not seen in these parts for years. Have I been unlucky? Do I not get out, go out, am I not outside often enough to see? What else am I missing?

Profile

totient: (Default)
phi

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789 101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 05:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios